Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Potter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 14, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1348 (ESH)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jasmine Marshall has brought this action pro se alleging that her former employer, the United States Postal Service, discriminated against her, subjected her to harassment, and retaliated against her because of her disability. 1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant defendants’ motion.
BACKGROUND
On April 1, 2006, plaintiff began working as a part-time flexible letter carrier with the postal service on a 90-day probationary basis. (See Defs.’…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nurriddin v. BoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lewis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Bonnette v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Von Drasek v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.