Legal Opinion
Haubelt v. Bryan & Doyle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 2, 1935No. 25453PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was originally instituted in a justice of tbe peace court, and tbe pleadings do not set forth tbe issues involved. The trial court evidently considered tbe pleadings as amended to conform to tbe proof, and we shall do likewise.
The undisputed testimony discloses: That tbe plaintiff in error purchased from tbe defendant in error certain office furniture and office supplies for a total purchase price ®f $234.10. On the 12th day of April, 1929, a conditional sales contract was executed and delivered covering a part of said furniture, the purchase price of which was $205.84. This left…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Cash Register Co. v. Stockyards Cash MarketSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Galbreath v. MayoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Phelan v. Stock Yards BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. WaltherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. KochSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Mondie v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- C. I. T. Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ahrens Refrigerator Co. v. R. H. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Selected Investments Corporation v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.