Legal Opinion
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Koch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 25, 1899PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from the Probate Court of. Garfield County: before W. 31. Anderson, Probate Judge. Action by the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company against W. H. Koch and T. J. Koch. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
Thie McCormick Harvesting Machine company, a corporation, brought its action in the probate, court of Garfield county against W. H. Koch and T. J. Koch to recover judgment on two promissory notes for the sum of $47 each, with interest, executed by the defendants for a harvesting machine. Each of the notes contained the following provision:
“The express condition of the sale and purchase of the harvesting machine for which this note is given is such that the title, ownership, or possession does not pas j from the said McCormick Harvesting Machine company…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Anderson v. Oklahoma Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- International Harvester Co. v. BauerOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Haubelt v. Bryan & DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- C. I. T. Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.