Legal Opinion

Galbreath v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1918No. 9218PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from District Court, Coal County; J, H. Linebaugh, Judge. Action by C. A. Mayo and another, doing business under the partnership name of Mayo Furniture Company, against Robert Galbreath. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

Defendants in error brought suit against plaintiff in error, and the cause was tried upon an amended petition.

Hereafter the parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court.

The salient points of said petition are:

(li That the defendant was indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $3,063.95, for furniture, chattels, and equipment now located in the Galbreath Hotel at Bromide, Olcla.(2) That no part of the principal sum due under said contract had been paid, but that the interest for the year ending June 1, 1915, had been paid.(3) That by the terms of “said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. American Process Co. v. Florida White Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Smith v. BarberIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bailey v. HerveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Frisch v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. Stockyards Cash MarketSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Board of County Comr's v. Western Bank & Office Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Mercantile Trust Co. v. RolandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API