Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 22, 1979No. 77-654PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The question presented in this case is whether the petitioner, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (A&P), violated § 2 (f) of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U. S. C. § 13 (f),1 by knowingly inducing or receiving illegal price discrimina-tions from the Borden Co. (Borden).
*72The alleged violation was reflected in a 1965 agreement between A&P and Borden under which Borden undertook to supply “private label” milk to more than 200 A&P stores in a Chicago area that included portions of Illinois and Indiana. This agreement resulted from an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Container Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- J.F. Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Falls City Industries, Inc. v. Vanco Beverage, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.