Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
The Robinson-Patman Act, directed primarily against sellers who discriminate in favor of large buyers, includes a provision under which proceedings may be had against buyers who knowingly induce or receive discriminatory prices. That provision, § 2 (f) of the Act, is here for construction for the first time as a result of a complaint issued by the Federal Trade Commission against petitioner, a large buyer of candy and other confectionary products for resale through 230,000-odd automatic vending machines operated in 33 States and the District of Columbia. Petitioner, incorporated in 1931, has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.