Legal Opinion

Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1953No. 89PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

The Robinson-Patman Act, directed primarily against sellers who discriminate in favor of large buyers, includes a provision under which proceedings may be had against buyers who knowingly induce or receive discriminatory prices. That provision, § 2 (f) of the Act, is here for construction for the first time as a result of a complaint issued by the Federal Trade Commission against petitioner, a large buyer of candy and other confectionary products for resale through 230,000-odd automatic vending machines operated in 33 States and the District of Columbia. Petitioner, incorporated in 1931, has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API