Robinson v. Potterff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Ottawa County ; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action by T. L. - Bobinson and others against J. E. Potterff and others for an accounting under a mining lease. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBainey, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Ottawa county by T. L. Bobinson, W. P. McCullough, E. M. Lan-drum, and E. Stuckey, plaintiffs, against J. E. Potterff, J. S. Mabon, L. C. Church, and Wesley M. Smith, as defendants, alleging that plaintiffs owned an interest in a certain mining lease; that said lease was being operated by the defendants Church and Ma-bon, and that Smith and Potterff were interested in the royalties thereunder; and praying for an accounting as against said defendants. The defendants filed a joint answer admitting that Smith held two mining leases on the land,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Crump v. LanhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Tracy v. NorvellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bernard v. McRaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Croker v. ShurleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Clark v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923