Legal Opinion

State v. Rutledge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1922No. 17530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Respondent was charged by information with failure to furnish necessary food, clothing and medical attendance to and for his two minor children. He demurred to the information, and from an order sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action with prejudice, the state has appealed.

The information is based upon the Laws of 1913, p. 71, ch. 28; Rem. Comp. Stat., § 6908 et seq. Section 1 of the act provides:

“Every person who,...........
“2d: Willfully omits, without lawful excuse, to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter, or medical attendance for his or her child or children or ward or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hector v. HectorWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gibson v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Ditmar v. DitmarWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. DunstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Powers v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  3. State v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API