Legal Opinion

People v. Dunston

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 130PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Oakland; Smith, J. William E. Dunston was convicted of deserting and abandoning his minor children.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This case involves the question of whether or not respondent is liable to criminal prosecution for desertion and abandonment of his children, as defined in Act No. 144 of the Public Acts of 1907; he having previously been divorced from his wife, to whom the court had granted possession and custody of their minor children, decreeing an allowance to be paid to her for said children’s support, which allowance respondent has failed to fully pay. Respondent was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted under said Act No. 144 in the circuit court of Oakland county, and has removed the proceedings to this *369…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  3. Johnson v. OnstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. AlbrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. King v. Nash (In Re Estate of Erwin)Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. McComas v. GlendinningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Shumway v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Slattery v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API