Legal Opinion
Miller v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2006No. 05-33PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶ 1] A jury found Kirk Miller guilty of three counts of delivery of a controlled substance (methamphetamine). On appeal, Miller asks this Court to review whether he was denied his constitutional right to confront an adverse witness, whether he was denied a fair trial by the admission of a witness’ out of court statements and the witness’ guilty plea to a drug-related crime, and whether his convictions are supported by sufficient evidence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm the judgment and order of the district court.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Miller presents the following issues for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Travis J. Kovach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.