Legal Opinion

Story v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1988No. 87-243PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This is a pro se appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The district court denied the motion on procedural grounds without reaching its substantive merits. We determine that the procedural rules relied upon were erroneously construed, and we reverse.

Appellant states the issues as being:

“I. The district court committed reversible error when reasoning the court was not asked to set the motion for hearing, and when stating the court did not receive such a request.
“II. The court below erred when it decided Rule 34 and W.S.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Allied-Signal, Inc. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API