Hall v. Synalloy Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, Chief Judge.
The defendant Synalloy Corporation (hereinafter Synalloy) has moved this Court for an Order adjudicating the viability of its first defense to these actions. In that defense, Synalloy contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the actions because the plaintiffs’ exclusive remedies fall within the provisions of the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act dealing with occupational diseases. It appearing that a present discussion of the merits of this defense will permit this litigation to move more expeditiously, the motion is granted.
In this case, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- King v. Seitzingers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- John T. Stephens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Whitehouse Plastics D/B/A Aladdin Amusement ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- McIntyre v. E. J. Lavino & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Railco Multi-Construction Co. v. GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Colonial Bank v. Freeman (In Re Pacific Forest Products Corp.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1985
- Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp. of America, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1987
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.