Legal Opinion

King v. Seitzingers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1981No. 62653PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff in a suit for personal injury by lead poisoning appeals the grant of summary judgment to the defendant on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitation. Held:

The action was filed on October 9,1979. Code Ann. § 3-1004 (Ga. L. 1767, Cobb, 562 through 1964, p. 763) is applicable and provides that actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues.

Appellant contends that his cause of action did not accrue until he knew or reasonably should have known that appellee was the cause of his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Everhart v. Rich's, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Schiele v. Hobart Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Welch v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. McAuley v. WillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Corporation of Mercer University v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API