Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Synalloy Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided June 26, 1985No. CV182-158PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EDENFIELD, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”) maintains this declaratory judg ment action in diversity against its insured, Synalloy Corporation (“Synalloy”), and Synalloy’s various primary and excess insurers, for the purpose of having this Court decide which, if any, of these insurers, including Continental, are obligated under the terms, conditions, exclusions, and limitations of their individual policies with Synalloy, to defend Synalloy against certain tort claims asserted by its employees, and to indemnify Synalloy in the event that a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Beoties Emory v. Clarence Peeler, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superior Court Judge, Stone Mountain Judicial CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Allstate Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation v. The Employers Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Loftin v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- American States Insurance v. Hanson IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Voorhees v. Preferred Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.