Legal Opinion

Lactona, Inc. v. Lever Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 19, 1944No. 4869PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Paténts reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences holding that appellant was entitled to register the trade-mark “LIFEGUARD,” for use on “Devices for Oral Hygiene, Particularly Tooth Brushes, Massage Elements and Combined Tooth Brushes and Massage Elements.”

Appellant states in its application that it has used the trade-mark “LIFEGUARD” on its goods since July 15,1940.

In its notice of opposition, appellee alleged that it is the owner of the trade-mark “Lifebuoy,” for use on “products…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Albert Dickinson Co. v. Mellos Peanut Co. Of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  2. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Johnson & Johnson v. DiazDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
  4. Magitex Co. v. John Hudson Moore, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. Lever Bros. v. HormelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API