Nicolai-Neppach Co. v. Poore
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CO SHOW, J. —
It has become the settled law of this state that where a materialman furnishes material for a building to be erected on land belonging to a person other than the purchaser of such material in order to effect a lien on the owner’s interest in the real property it is necessary to give the notice prescribed by statute: Or. L„, § 10191. It is also well settled that where the material is furnished directly to the owner of the fee that such notice is not required: Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters, 102 Or. 314 (202 Pac. 554).
It is contended by appellant Wilhoit Springs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Oregon Lumber & Fuel Co. v. NolanOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Columbia River Door Co. v. ToddOregon Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Allison v. SchulerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Andersen v. TurpinOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Randolph v. ChristensenOregon Supreme Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.