Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Christensen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is a suit to establish and foreclose a mechanic’s lien. November 25, 1924, the plaintiff, a building contractor, and the defendant Christensen, entered into a contract whereby the former undertook to make some repairs and improve ments upon a dwelling-house. The contract price was the sum of $1,274.33. There is no dispute in the evidence of the contention that this contract was entered into, that work was done, and that its result was of benefit. The principal issue is whether the interest of the defendants TI. A. and Clara Sabbe is subject to the plaintiff’s lien. In the lower court the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Allen v. ElwertOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Security Savings Co. v. MackenzieOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Schram v. ManaryOregon Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lemire v. McCollumOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Drake Lumber Co. v. LindquistOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Paget v. PetersOregon Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API