Legal Opinion

Van Bronckhorst v. Taube

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1976No. 2-574A124PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Plaintiff Ir. Ch. H. van Bronekhorst filed this malpractice action against Doctors Jack I. Taube and Joseph B. Quigley on June 18, 1973. The doctors moved to dismiss the complaint under Ind. Rules of Procedure, TR. 12(B)(6), as being barred by the Malpractice Statute of Limitations, Ind. Ann. Stat. 34-4-19-1 (Burns Code Ed. 1973). The defendants’ motions were granted. Plaintiff appeals the dismissal.

For purposes of this appeal, the allegations of van Bronckhorst’s complaint must be taken as true. Millen v. Dorah (1974), 161 Ind. App. 430, 316 N.E.2d 403; Sanders v. Stewart (1973), 157 Ind.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Chaffin v. NicosiaIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Adams v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  4. Toth v. LenkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Gladis v. MellohIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Muller v. ThautNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hughes v. GlaeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cunningham v. Aluminum Co. of America, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Adams v. LurosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Nahmias v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API