Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Aluminum Co. of America, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 1981No. 1-680A164PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Presiding Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants Elwood E. Cunningham (Cunningham) and Marie Cunningham brought this action for personal injury and loss of services against Cunningham’s employer, Barmet of Indiana, Inc. (Barmet) and other defendants not parties to this appeal. 1 Cunningham also sought a declaratory judgment that portions of Indiana’s Workmen’s Compensation Act are unconstitutional. In accordance with Ind.Code 34-4-10-11, the Attorney General of the State of Indiana was served and is an appellee herein.
Barmet filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- American Maize Products Co. v. NichiporchikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
- Morris v. City of KokomoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Seaton v. United States Rubber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Houston v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Joyce v. A.C. & S., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Indiana University Hospitals v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- National Can Corp. v. JovanovichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Scalf v. Berkel, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.