Legal Opinion

Rupniewski Et Ux. v. Miazga

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1929No. Appeal, 262PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

On September 8, 1927, Kazimierz Miazga and Bertha Miazga his wife, two defendants, hereinafter referred to as defendants, entered into a written agreement with plaintiffs whereby plaintiffs were to convey to defendants premises No. 2830 Chatham Street, Philadelphia, and ten unimproved lots situated at Woodcrest, Camden County, New Jersey, at a total valuation of $8,000, and defendants were to convey to plaintiffs No. 2553 E. Ann Street, Philadelphia, and also transfer stock, fixtures and good will of an ice cream and candy business which defendants carried on in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Central Trust & Savings Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Welsh Et Ux. v. Ford Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Humphrey Et Ux. v. Brown Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Crick v. PaullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Knorr v. KnorrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Mrahunec v. FaustiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Snow v. Corsica Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Merritz v. CircelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Brooks v. Towson Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API