Legal Opinion

United States v. Introcaso

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 2007No. 05-4088PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

We decide principally whether a 19th-Century shotgun hanging on a defendant’s living room wall qualifies as an “antique firearm” not subject to the general registration requirement of the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5801-72. A jury convicted Alexander M. Introcaso in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on two counts of violating the Firearms Act by possessing an unregistered firearm (the shotgun) and unregistered destructive devices (hand grenades). In addition to Introcaso’s contention that the shotgun was…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Charles Barefoot, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. MercadoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API