Legal Opinion

United States v. Little

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 19, 2016No. 15-2019PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

After police discovered stolen weapons in Cody Little’s residence, a jury convicted him of being a felon in possession of a firearm and of possessing a stolen firearm. Little appeals, challenging several jury instructions. We agree with Little that constructive possession requires proof of intent to exercise dominion and control over an object following the Supreme Court’s opinion in Henderson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1780, 191 L.Ed.2d 874 (2015). However, because the evidence presented at trial compels the conclusion that Little intended to exercise control…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Christian PaulinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. United States of America Government of the Virgin Islands v. Clement XavierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. CottonNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. BenfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. KahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API