Legal Opinion
United States v. Doe
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 30, 2009No. 08-3968, 08-4028PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The Appellants, John and Jane Doe,1 appeal the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s denial of their 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motions for reduction of sentence. On February 1, 2007, both Appellants pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute, and distribution of, crack cocaine. The Appellants were granted significant substantial-assistance departures below both their statutorily required mínimums and below their pre-amendment Guideline ranges. After the United States Sentencing Commission passed Amendment 706, which lowered the U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 base offense…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DoublinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.