Legal Opinion

Morford v. California Western States Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.

The crucial question in this case is whether, under the circumstances, as disclosed by the testimony, a delivery to insured of the policy of insurance may be said to have been made.

The policy was placed in the mail at Sacramento, California, September 27, 1934, postage paid and addressed to the Portland, Oregon, office of defendant insurance company. Accompanying it was the following letter on the stationery of defendant:

“September 27, 1934

Mr. J. F. Howell: Ee: Benn M. Morford

Pol. #339352

We enclose herewith policy of above number, which has been issued as follows:

Plan of insurance Ordinary…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Piedmont, Etc. Life-Ins. Co. v. Ewing, Etc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kilborn v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Narver v. California State Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Unterharnscheidt v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Republic National Life Insurance v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Grau v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Krause v. WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Argonaut Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API