Legal Opinion

Ragar v. Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund III

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 14, 1987No. 87-8PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant complains about a court order which is not final and thus not appealable. We must, therefore, dismiss the appeal.

Don Ragar, the appellant, was a limited partner in the appellee Hooper-Bond Limited Partnership Fund III (“the Fund”). Ragar, on behalf of himself and other limited partners, sued Hooper and Bond, who were the general partners in the Fund, for fraud and recovered a judgment for $150,000. The Fund was named as a plaintiff in that action, although the complaint characterized the action as derivative. [See Benton Window and Door Little Rock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Corning Bank v. Delta Rice Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Hooper v. RagarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Benton Window & Door Little Rock Division, Inc. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kilgore v. VinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Ragar v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API