Ragar v. Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund III
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellant complains about a court order which is not final and thus not appealable. We must, therefore, dismiss the appeal.
Don Ragar, the appellant, was a limited partner in the appellee Hooper-Bond Limited Partnership Fund III (“the Fund”). Ragar, on behalf of himself and other limited partners, sued Hooper and Bond, who were the general partners in the Fund, for fraud and recovered a judgment for $150,000. The Fund was named as a plaintiff in that action, although the complaint characterized the action as derivative. [See Benton Window and Door Little Rock…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fratesi v. BondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Corning Bank v. Delta Rice Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Hooper v. RagarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Benton Window & Door Little Rock Division, Inc. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kilgore v. VinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ragar v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990