Legal Opinion

Benton Window & Door Little Rock Division, Inc. v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 3, 1986No. 86-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Respondent William Faust brought this action as a shareholder’s derivative suit. He named the corporate petitioner and the two individual petitioners, who are corporate directors, as defendants. At the time the suit was brought, Faust was not only a shareholder but was the president of the corporation. Faust brought the action in Saline County which is the county of his residence. The basis for laying venue there is Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-605 (Repl. 1979) which provides:

Actions against corporations — An action, other than those in sections 84, 85 and 90 [§§ 27-601 —…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atkins Pickle Co., Inc. v. Burrough-Uerling-Brasuell Consulting Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Red Bud Realty Co. v. SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Ozark Supply Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Hot Springs Street Railway Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sobba Ex Rel. Sobel Inc. v. ElmenDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2006
  2. Ragar v. Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund IIISupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Desoto Gathering Co. v. RamseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API