Legal Opinion

Ragar v. Hooper

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 1989No. 89-32PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John I. Purtle, Justice.

The trial court granted the appellees’ motion to dismiss and to strike the appellant’s motion for payment of expenses and other relief. For appeal it is argued that the court erred in finding that the work performed by the appellant was not a “reasonable expense,” and that the court further erred in dismissing the motion on the grounds that the case had already been closed. We agree with the trial court that this case has ended.

This is the fifth time the parties in this case have been before this court since 1986. On June 2,1986, we affirmed the award of damages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. RagarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Taggart v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund III v. RagarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Ragar v. Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund IIISupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ragar v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Ragar v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API