Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Ragar

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 1986No. 86-62PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The primary argument submitted by the appellants on this appeal is that the circuit court was so lacking in jurisdiction of the subject matter that its judgment was void and should be set aside. We find no merit in this argument, or in the appellants’ subordinate contentions, and affirm the judgment.

In 1979 the two individual appellants, Hooper and Bond, as general partners, organized a limited partnership for the purpose of buying, subdividing, and selling a 20-acre tract of land west of Little Rock. The limited partners were a number of investors in the venture,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Tankersley v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Golden Tee, Inc. v. Venture Golf Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Jones v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Estate of Puddy v. GillamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Clark v. Farmers Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API