Legal Opinion

State v. M. L. R.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2013No. 11MH0006MS; A148456PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Upon finding that appellant was dangerous to herself as the result of a mental disorder, the trial court entered a judgment committing her to the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS) for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130(1)(b)(C);ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A). Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment, arguing, among other things, that the trial court violated ORS 426.100(1), which requires trial courts to provide allegedly mentally ill persons with certain information before civil commitment hearings. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court committed plain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. ScharfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. J.R.B. (In re J.R.B.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. R. E. F. (In re R. E. F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. V. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API