Legal Opinion

State v. R. E. F. (In re R. E. F.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 2019No. A168881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

*200Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the judgment should be reversed because the court failed to issue a citation to appellant as required by ORS 426.090.1 Appellant acknowledges that he did not preserve his assignment of error, but requests that we review and correct the error as plain error. ORAP 5.45(1). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred and that the judgment of commitment should be reversed. We agree and accept the state's concession.

Under ORS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. J. R. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. R. E. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. K. R. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API