Legal Opinion

State v. J.R.B. (In re J.R.B.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 21, 2018No. A161688PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTookey, J.

*39*859Appellant in this civil commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. See ORS 426.130. On appeal, in appellant's second assignment of error, he contends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him of all the possible results of the proceedings as required by ORS 426.100(1)(c).1 The state contends that the trial court did not plainly err because it "adequately advised appellant directly and completely at the outset of the hearing regarding the majority of the rights outlined in ORS…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. MTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. B. A. F. (In re B. A. F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. J. R. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. G. C.-M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State v. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. J. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. S. N. O.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API