Legal Opinion

State v. V. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2014No. 11074MC; A148684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of involuntary commitment for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Among other contentions, appellant asserts, in an unpreserved assignment, that (1) the trial court erred in failing to advise her of the right to subpoena witnesses, as required by ORS 426.100(1) (2009), amended by Oregon Laws 2013, chapter 360, section 241; (2) the violation constitutes plain error, see ORAP 5.45(1); and (3) we should exercise our discretion to review the error. We conclude that the trial court committed plain error in failing to advise appellant of her right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. M. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Z. A. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Hecker v. FellaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Hecker v. FellaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. State v. B. O.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. K. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API