Legal Opinion

Adams v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 9, 2013No. Case No. 2:10-cv-826PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.

This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs Rusby Adams, Jr., Leslie Schell, Daniel Stewart and Kevin Jones are former employees of the Metal Container Corporation (“MCC”), a subsidiary of defendant Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. (“ABC”). Adams was employed at the MCC plant in Columbus, Ohio, Schell and Stewart were employed at the MCC plant in Gainesville, Florida, and Jones was employed at the MCC plant in Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin. As employees of MCC, plaintiffs…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Estate of Osborn Ex Rel. Osborn v. KempSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rusby Adams, Jr. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Baker v. Ohio Operating Eng'rs Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  3. Rusby Adams, Jr. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API