Baker v. Ohio Operating Eng'rs Pension Plan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This is an action for benefits under an employee benefit plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. ("ERISA"). This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Conduct Discovery. (ECF No. 29.) For the reasons that follow, Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED .
I
Defendant Carol A. Wilson is the fund administrator and plan administrator of Defendant Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Plan ("Pension Plan"), an employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Schwalm v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Bertie Mae Rhoton v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bulas v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Ruhe v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Williamson v. LunarDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2023