Legal Opinion

Barto v. Stewart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1899No. 3171PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. James A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

The Bank of Puyallup was organized as a banking corporation under the laws of the state of Washington on the 10th day of September, 1890, with a capital stock of $100,000, divided into one thousand shares-of the par value of $100 each. On the 26th day of May, 1893, the bank closed its doors and discontinued business-as a going concern, and on the 7th day of June, 1893, in an action brought in the superior court of Pierce county for that purpose, was by that court adjudged insolvent,, and the respondent was appointed receiver of its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eureka Consol. Min. Co. v. Richmond Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1877
  2. Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gray v. Palmer & EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Neis v. FarquharsonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Minick v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE v. GannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Griffin v. WarburtonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Empson v. FortuneWashington Supreme Court · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API