Neis v. Farquharson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
— In the year 188"3, the respondents, Philip Neis and Richard Brangon, partners under the firm name of Philip Neis & Co., instituted this action against William Wagner and Alexander S. Farquharson, partners doing business at Puyallup under the name and style of Wm. Wagner & Co., to compel the defendants to account for and pay over the proceeds of certain hops alleged to have been purchased by defendants for and on account of plaintiffs in the year 1882.
The complaint alleges that on or about June 7, 1882, the plaintiffs and defendants agreed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vattier v. HindeSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Dutton v. . WillnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Smith's Ex'x v. Profitt's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
- Toulouse v. BurkettIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Bank of Stockton v. L. L. Howland & Co.California Supreme Court · 1871
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barto v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Ward v. MagahaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Cox v. GettysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Newberry v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.