Legal Opinion

Sooner v. Goetze

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 5, 1929No. 27,103PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to cancel a note and mortgage made by the plaintiffs to the defendants upon the ground that it was never delivered. There were findings for the plaintiffs. The defendants appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

On April 1,1927, the plaintiff M. Addie Sonner was the owner of a lot in Minneapolis subject to a mortgage to one Burrill, upon which there was $2,500 due. P. J. Sonner was her husband. One John A. Lane had attended to the property of the plaintiffs and had advanced money in payments on the mortgage and matters incidental thereto. In the early part of 1927 the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larson v. Lombard Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Madsen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Dart v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Danielson v. TessmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Farnham v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Berger v. KnobelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API