Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Schuman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1921No. Docket No. 108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Bay; Houghton (Samuel G.), J. Bill by George Schuman against Christopher Schuman and another for the forfeiture of a life lease. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

December 28, 1900, defendant Christopher Schuman, then unmarried, deeded to the-plaintiff, his son, 40 acres of land near Bay City, and took back a life lease in which he agreed to pay all taxes and assessments and to keep the premises in repair. Having deeded away his property he got married and is now 80 years of age and helpless and penniless. Claiming that his father committed waste in cutting trees and in neglecting the place and removing some buildings and that he had not paid the taxes for *186several years, plaintiff filed the bill herein to have an account taken of the damages and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Watrous v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Phelan v. BoylanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Lee v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Douglas v. Union Mutual Life Ins.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Torrez v. BradyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  2. McDonald v. KerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Worthington Motors v. CrouseNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API