Legal Opinion

Everton v. Parker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1891No. 310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Rung County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

The respondent, Fred Everton, as plaintiff in a cause pending in the superior court in which Powell *332was defendant, obtained judgment by confession against Powell for tbe sum of $746.87, principal sum, and $20.30 costs of suit. Afterwards the appellant was garnisheed under execution, as a supposed debtor of Powell. On the 24th day of March, 1891, Powell made affidavit that appellant was indebted to him, and thereupon Everton moved for, and obtained from the court, an order for the examination of Parker. This order was made on March 24th:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hartman v. OlveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. McDowell v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McGurren v. Thomas GarrityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Habenicht v. LissakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leopold v. SilvermanMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Johnson v. LundeenMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. United States v. HuffUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  4. Hoopes v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API