Dunsmoor v. Furstenfeldt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
The plaintiff (clerk of the superior court) brought this action to compel the defendants, Furstenfeldt and Geinger, to interplead as to their respective adverse claims to be paid a sum of money in the possession and custody of the plaintiff, which he was willing and ready to pay to the one to whom the court should determine it was due.
The court adjudged that Furstenfeldt was entitled to the money, and Geinger brings this appeal from the judgment upon the judgment roll, and contends that upon the facts found the judgment should have been in his favor.
The material facts found are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Estate NeracCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Rodman v. MunsonNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by42 opinions
- Dwight A. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hanna P. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilson v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1898
- BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Schwartz v. California Claim Service, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.