Legal Opinion

McGurren v. Thomas Garrity

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1886No. 9294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

— It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff, Ellen McGurren, had a judgment for $2,261.50 against the defendant, Thomas Garrity, and that Garrity had a note for five hundred dollars and interest, made by defendants Myles and Mary Swift, and secured by a mortgage on their real property; that an execution was issued on the judgment, and placed in the hands of the sheriff, who “ duly and legally levied it upon the right, title, and interest of the said Thomas Garrity in said mortgaged premises, designating his interest therein as a mortgage, and duly and' legally served the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carpentier v. BrenhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Johnson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Mack v. WetzlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Bonfils v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. South Ogden Land, Building & Improvement Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Everton v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Breedlove v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.California Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API