McDowell v. Bell
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
— Application for writ of prohibition. In September, 1889, one Primm commenced an action in the superior court of Shasta County against one Edson. In the action, such proceedings were had as that judgment was duly given and made in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, October 4, 1889. Execution was issued to the sheriff of Shasta County, and returned unsatisfied. Upon proceedings supplemental to execution, Bertha Edson was examined touching certain property held by her, to wit, a house and lot in the town of Sisson, Siskiyou County, claimed by the judgment creditor to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hartman v. OlveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oksner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lewis v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- First National Bank of Laramie v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. WeedWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Blake v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.