Legal Opinion

Kurland v. Simmons

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1954No. Civ. 19976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs after , trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover for attorney’s fees, defendant appeals.

Facts-. It was alleged in the complaint:

Count I, that defendant became indebted to plaintiffs in the aggregate sum of $20,000, on which the balance of $16,200 remained unpaid, for the reasonable value of legal services rendered by plaintiffs on defendant’s behalf and at his request in connection with proceedings had in and before the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, State of California, in an action entitled “Edward E. Simmons,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Castagnino v. BallettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Preston v. HerminghausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lucy v. LucyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Zalk v. General Exploration Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Higgins v. Desert Braemar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API