Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1ConcurrenceWardlaw, Circuit Judge
Whoa!!! The Chief has put the proverbial cart before the horse. The district court did not touch upon the merits of the claims alleged in the complaint in any manner whatsoever, and neither did our panel’s disposition. Nor did we or the district court invoke the doctrine of “hypothetical jurisdiction” in an effort to reach the merits, quite contrary to the dissent’s assertion. Rather, based on the record before the district court, the panel concluded only that the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed this action under the forum non conveniens doctrine. This was, by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.