Legal Opinion
City of Orangeburg v. Farmer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 15, 1936No. 14335PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Baker.
In November, 1933, the city council of Orangeburg passed an ordinance which was intended to prevent persons from soliciting the sale of merchandise by going in and upon private residences within the incorporate limits of Orange-burg. The full text of the ordinance will more clearly show its intent and purpose, and is in the following language:
"An Ordinance to Declare the Practice of Solicitors, Peddlers, Hawkers, Itinerant Merchants and Transient Vendors in Going In and Upon Private Residences for the Purpose of Soliciting Orders or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Henderson v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- City of Columbia v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Town of Darlington v. WardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Thomasson v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- State Ex Rel. Southern Ry. v. EarleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- City of Hillsboro v. PurcellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Prior v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.