Legal Opinion

Simsohn v. Wetter

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1933No. Appeal 352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This action in assumpsit was based on the following contract:

“February 19, 1929.
“Hotel Lorraine,

Broad & Fairmount Sts.,

Philadelphia, Pa.

Attention — F. L. Scholl, Gen’l Mgr.

Gentlemen:

Confirming our conversation of today, we are herewith proposing tQ render you power plant service for the sum of five hundred dollars ($500)| per annum.

Services will consist of weekly visits to your plant and oftener when necessary, and will include:(a) Boiler feed-water treatment for the prevention of scale formation;(b) Analysis of coal and ash on alternate weeks;(c) Flue gas and combustion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. MagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Orth & Bro. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Standiford v. KlomanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Jull's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schroeder Bros., Inc. v. SabelliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hay v. Pittsburgh Lodge No. 46 Loyal Order of MooseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Bressi v. Dobroth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API