Legal Opinion

Lan-Dale Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 29, 2009No. 03-1956CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432 OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.1

Bnef History of Proceedings

This ease presents yet another example of a potentially meritorious action negated by the workings of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (2006). See Griffin v. United States, 85 Fed.Cl. 179 (2008). Plaintiff Lan-Dale Company (“LanDale”) filed suit in this Court on August 21, 2003, asserting a claim for specific performance of a settlement agreement (Count I) and a claim for money damages (Count II). On the same day, however, Lan-Dale filed a similar suit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. LanDale’s complaints in both of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kanemoto v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. County of Cook, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the Navy v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kaw Nation of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Klamath Irrigation District v. the United States 01-591l and 01-5910l Through 01United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Berry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Parker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API