Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harsch v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1998No. 95-2131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Lorenzo Harsch, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio (“commission”) to vacate its order denying his application for R.C. 4123.56(B) wage loss compensation and to grant this relief. The commission denied this compensation after determining that *281Harsch had not pursued employment within his medical capabilities in good faith and, thus, did not qualify. The Court of Appeals for Franklin County refused the writ, holding that the commission’s decision was not an abuse of discretion. The cause is now before this court upon appeal as of right.

Harsch…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Vanover v. Emery WorldwideOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Consolidated Freightways v. EngererOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martishius v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-581 (7-12-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Harsch v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (11-9-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Stafford v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API