Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 1996-1298PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Claimant seeks wage-loss compensation for periods during which she was either unemployed or working but making less than she had at Evenflo.

No one disputes that claimant made less after she left Evenflo. No one disputes the validity of claimant’s physical restrictions or their prohibitive effect on a return to the former position of employment. Appellants instead oppose payment on two grounds: voluntary abandonment and a lack of a good-faith job search.

Appellants initially assert that claimant abandoned her job at Evenflo for reasons unrelated to her injury, breaking the causal connection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Vanover v. Emery WorldwideOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Consolidated Freightways v. EngererOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Frederick v. Licking County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. McGonegle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Harsch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Stafford v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API