Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Rear Door Bookstore v. Tenth District Court of Appeals
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 8, 1992No. Nos. 90-1941 and 91-995PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*355Case No. 91-995
The cause is affirmed on authority of the court of appeals’ decision below, rendered March 21, 1991 and attached as an appendix to this opinion.
Case No. 90-1941
The mandamus action is dismissed as moot.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
Appendix
McCormac, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, P & T Investors, Inc., d.b.a. Rear Door Bookstore, and G.J. Wenner, appeal from the judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas finding appellants’ place of business a “public nuisance,” as that term is defined in R.C. 3767.01, and ordering the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Cleveland v. TrzebuckowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Eastwood Mall, Inc. v. SlancoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.